The Web Ontology LANGUAGE (short OWL) is a specification of the W3C, in order Ontologien on the basis a formal specification language provide, publish and to distribute to be able. It concerns to describe terms of a domain and their relations formally in such a way that also software (agent) the meaning it processes ("understands") can (to be able). OWL is thus a substantial component of the Semantic Web initiative of Tim Berners Lee. OWL be based technically on the RDF syntax and historically on DAML+OIL, and goes thereby beyond the expression power of RDF pattern far. Additionally to RDF and RDF pattern further Sprachkonstrukte is introduced, which permits it to formulate expressions similarly the predicate calculus.
The acronym for Web Ontology LANGUAGE would actually have had to be WOL, not OWL. In reference on the literary figure of the owl from Milnes Pu the bear, which could write their name as an only animal in the forest (and writes the same however with a letter turner in the English original WOL instead of OWL), became this letter turner in reverse for the OWL taken over.
OWL comes along in three different versions. In addition the language levels OWL Lite, OWL DL and OWL Full were defined. For the employment of OWL Lite/DL restrictions were defined, which the development of Tools to facilitate and/or complete inference possible to make be supposed.
The "Light version" was created with the goal of creating a subset of the language which can be implemented simply. It serves particularly for creating simple taxonomies and easily axiomatisierter Ontologien. Various Sprachkonstrukte from OWL DL was omitted.
This is the level, whose semantics near-hands still earliest on DAML+OIL. DL stands for SHOIN for the description logic (description logic) \ mathcal {} (D), which is equivalent to a decidable subset of the predicate calculus of first stage. In order to ensure the image barness on this logic, various restrictions for the employment were inserted by RDFS Konstrukten, for example may be a class not instance of another class.
OWL Full consists of the same Sprachkonstrukten as OWL DL, does however without the restrictions. Thus the Ontologien is unentscheidbar, can make for it however descriptor-logical expressions possible of higher degree.
The specification extends the meaning of RDF and RDF pattern by further Konstrukte to partly also limit in order to increase expression power (or to reach around Entscheidbarkeit).
OWL differentiates between classes, characteristics (properties) and instances. Classes stand for concepts. They can possess characteristics. Instances are individuals of one or several classes.
The example describes the concepts <Person>, <Gender> and <Woman>. Woman is defined, as one <Person> with the value <female> in the Property <gender>, which must belong to the class <Gender>. The instance <STilgner> is thus as <Person> described a woman (<Woman>). By means of inference this affiliation can be determined.
<rdf: RDF xmlns: rdf= of " http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns # " xmlns: rdfs= " http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema # " xmlns: owl= " http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl # " xmlns: j.0= " http://localhost:8080/OWLBuergerInformation.owl # " > </rdf: RDF>
Since the OWL specification is relatively new, at present few Tools.Die number exist however constantly rise. Many are also freely available (open SOURCE).
We found here 4 related websites.
Index | Privacy | Terms Of Use | Sitemap | Feedback